'Let me explain the problem science has with Jesus Christ.' The atheistprofessor of philosophy pauses before his class and then asks one of hisnew students to stand.
'You're a Christian, aren't you, son?'
'Yes sir,' the student says.
'So you believe in God?'
'Absolutely.'
'Is God good?'
'Sure! God's good.'
'Is God all-powerful? Can God do anything?'
'Yes.'
'Are you good or evil?'
'The Bible says I'm evil.'
The professor grins knowingly. 'Aha! The Bible!' He considers for amoment.
'Here's one for you. Let's say there's a sick person over here and you can cure him. You can do it. Would you help him? Would you try?'
'Yes sir, I would.'
'So you're good...!'
'I wouldn't say that.'
'But why not say that? You'd help a sick and maimed person if you could. Most of us would if we could. But God doesn't.'
The student does not answer, so the professor continues. 'Hedoesn't, does he? My brother was a Christian who died of cancer, eventhough he prayed to Jesus to heal him How is this Jesus good? Hmmm? Canyou answer that one?'
The student remains silent.
'No, you can't, can you?' the professor says. He takes a sip ofwater from a glass on his desk to give the student time to relax.
'Let's start again, young fella Is God good?'
'Er...yes,' the student says.
'Is Satan good?'
The student doesn't hesitate on this one. 'No.'
'Then where does Satan come from?'
The student : 'From...God...'
'That's right. God made Satan, didn't he? Tell me, son. Is thereevil in this world?'
'Yes, sir.'
'Evil's everywhere, isn't it? And God did make everything,correct?'
'Yes.'
'So who created evil?' The professor continued, 'If God createdeverything, then God created evil, since evil exists, and according tothe principle that our works define who we are, then God is evil.'
Without allowing the student to answer, the professor continues:'Is there sickness? Immorality? Hatred? Ugliness? All these terriblethings, do they exist in this world?'
The student: 'Yes.'
'So who created them?'
The student does not answer again, so the professor repeats hisquestion. 'Who created them? There is still no answer. Suddenly thelecturer breaks away to pace in front of the classroom. The class ismesmerized.
'Tell me,' he continues onto another student. 'Do you believe inJesus Christ, son?'
The student's voice is confident: 'Yes, professor, I do.'
The old man stops pacing. 'Science says you have five senses youuse to identify and observe the world around you. Have you ever seen Jesus?'
'No sir. I've never seen Him'
'Then tell us if you've ever heard your Jesus?'
'No, sir, I have not.'
'Have you ever actually felt your Jesus, tasted your Jesus orsmelt your Jesus? Have you ever had any sensory perception of JesusChrist, or God for that matter?'
'No, sir, I'm afraid I haven't.'
'Yet you still believe in him?'
'Yes.'
'According to the rules of empirical, testable, demonstrableprotocol, science says your God doesn't exist. What do you say to that,son?'
'Nothing,' the student replies. 'I only have my faith.'
'Yes, faith,' the professor repeats. 'And that is the problemscience has with God. There is no evidence, only faith.'
The student stands quietly for a moment, before asking aquestion of his own. 'Professor, is there such thing as heat?'
'Yes,' the professor replies. 'There's heat.'
'And is there such a thing as cold?'
'Yes, son, there's cold too.'
'No sir, there isn't.'
The professor turns to face the student, obviously interested.The room suddenly becomes very quiet. The student begins to explain.
'You can have lots of heat, even more heat, super-heat,mega-heat, unlimited heat, white heat, a little heat or no heat, but wedon't have anything called 'cold'. We can hit up to 458 degrees belowzero, which is no heat, but we can't go any further after that. There isno such thing as cold; otherwise we would be able to go colder than thelowest -458 degrees. Every body or object is susceptible to study whenit has or transmits energy, and heat is what makes a body or matter haveor transmit energy. Absolute zero (-458 F) is the total absence of heat.You see, sir, cold is only a word we use to describe the absence ofheat. We cannot measure cold. Heat we can measure in thermal unitsbecause heat is energy. Cold is not the opposite of heat, sir, just theabsence of it.'
Silence across the room. A pen drops somewhere in the classroom,sounding like a hammer.
'What about darkness, professor. Is there such a thing asdarkness?'
'Yes,' the professor replies without hesitation. 'What is nightif it isn't darkness?'
'You're wrong again, sir. Darkness is not something; it is theabsence of something. You can have low light, normal light, brightlight, flashing light, but if you have no light constantly you haveNothing and it's called darkness, isn't it? That's the meaning we use todefine the word. In reality, darkness isn't. If it were, you would be ableto make darkness darker, wouldn't you?'
The professor begins to smile at the student in front of him.This will be a good semester. 'So what point are you making, young man?'
'Yes, professor. My point is, your philosophical premise isflawed to start with, and so your conclusion must also be flawed.'
The professor's face cannot hide his surprise this time.'Flawed? Can you explain how?'
'You are working on the premise of duality,' the studentexplains. 'You argue that there is life and then there's death; a goodGod and a bad God. You are viewing the concept of God as somethingfinite, something we can measure. Sir, science can't even explain athought. It uses electricity and magnetism, but has never seen, muchless fully understood either one. To view death as the opposite of lifeis to be ignorant of the fact that death cannot exist as a substantivething. Death is not the opposite of life, just the absence of it.'
'Now tell me, professor. Do you teach your students that theyevolved from a monkey?'
'If you are referring to the natural evolutionary process, youngman, yes, of course I do'
'Have you ever observed evolution with your own eyes, sir?'
The professor begins to shake his head, still smiling, as herealizes where the argument is going. A very good semester, indeed
'Since no one has ever observed the process of evolution at workand cannot even prove that this process is an on-going endeavor, are younot teaching your opinion, sir? Are you now not a scientist, but apreacher?'
The class is in uproar. The student remains silent until theCommotion has subsided.
'To continue the point you were making earlier to the otherstudent, let me give you an example of what I mean.'
The student looks around the room. 'Is there anyone in the classwho has ever seen the professor's brain?' The class breaks out intolaughter.
'Is there anyone here who has ever heard the professor's brain,felt the professor's brain, touched or smelled the professor's brain? Noone appears to have done so. So, according to the established rules ofempirical, stable, demonstrable protocol, science says that you have nobrain, with all due respect, sir. So if science says you have no brain,how can we trust your lectures, sir?'
Now the room is silent. The professor just stares at thestudent, his face unreadable.
Finally, after what seems an eternity, the old man answers. 'Iguess you'll have to take them on faith.'
'Now, you accept that there is faith, and, in fact, faith existswith life,' the student continues. 'Now, sir, is there such a thing asevil?'
Now uncertain, the professor responds, 'Of course, there is. Wesee it everyday. It is in the daily example of man's inhumanity to man.It is in the multitude of crime and violence everywhere in the world.These manifestations are nothing else but evil.'
To this the student replied, 'Evil does not exist sir, or atleast it does not exist unto itself. Evil is simply the absence of God.It is just like darkness and cold, a word that man has created to describethe absence of God.
God did not create evil. Evil is the result of what happens when man does not have God's love present in his heart. It's like the cold that comes when there is no heat or the darkness that comes when there is no light.'
The professor sat down.
Yes, today was a half day, that means I'ill have 4 and 1/2 days of fun. The long break is due to chinese new year, I am going out, so I have to study for the tests on saturday and sunday. The is going to be so fun.
I know this will stir up objections, so if u have any, please to it on the tagboard. Here it goes, although sec 3 life was hetic, but once you get use to it, it will be ok, but there will be still some rough patches on the way. Anyway, sec 3 has a lot more fun stuff, as in the subjects are more deep. I agree with the teachers about the deep part. Sec 3, at first I though was going to be real bad, I was so nervous after the 3rd day. Then somehow, on the fourth day, all went well.
Here are what I think of the lessons:
Biology:A subject that studys life science, you can really see the beauty of the cells under a microscope, how wonderful.
Physics: Another math subject, we go into the thigns that happen around us.
Chemistry: The menicus of the water mark is really amazing. Chemistry, a study about chemicals and other stuff.
Geography Elective: Map readings, difficult. The way we read contours adn stuff, now that good.
Social Studies:"Half history, half propaganda" said by someone. This subject actually teach you about world things.
Maththematics: Nice, all those new stuff and all.
A Math: "Beautiful" Mr Foo refering to an equation during lecture. In A math, you got one step wrong, and don't realise it you can almost say bye to finding the right answer.
Chinese: Mrs Lee-Sem is a real push-over.
English: Project your voice and speak"british english"
LOL, I did not update for a long, long, long, long, long, long time. But life's kinda fun. Little miss plastic/
botox thought my compo was written by a
gril, what the heck, has the
botox done too much to
ur brain(I'm just joking, I'm not that insulting), but anyway what the heck, why is my compo like written by a girl, so what is she trying to say only girls can write good compos. Put that aside, I'm a going to be like mugging, at least I hope so, wait, hope is inappropriate, I NEED to, but i guess the mugging need not be that hard, like 1-2% maybe. Lessons are kinda great, I am getting use to it, like about 60% of it or less. There is going to be a whole lot of tests next week, so
sian.
Today,I called
Mdm Rozy a racist, because they humanities department, the social studies part when to put one test on Wednesday, after
CNY, so then
Goeg Elect also did the same thing, but we were only told today, so i called her a racist, for like stressing the Chinese. The trainee teacher was like" RACIST!?".
And thanks to Phillip and
Pannawit, I am now like becoming a racist. First sec one came to, then i got influence to be a sick person, so now this. I don't want to be a racist-
racist. Okay, for me there are 2 parts to racism, one is the
comedian and the other
is the violent one. I put myself under the comedian one, but I want to be like not so deep into it.